|
October 11, 2004
Brij Sharma, CEO, Tēla Sourcing speaks at the
SIIA National Conference
Claims outsourcing can benefit TPA clients
SIIA National Educational Conference and Expo
By MICHAEL BRADFORD
MIAMI-Employers using third-party
administrators that outsource claims to offshore service providers should be
aware of both the advantages and pitfalls that come with such arrangements, an
executive with a company that provides outsourcing services contends.
Employers need to ask a few questions of their
TPAs to determine whether claims are being sent offshore and to ascertain the
reliability of those outsourcing services, said Brij Sharma, chief executive
officer of Tēla Sourcing Inc., a Baltimore-based company that provides
outsourcing services.
It is important that a vendor providing
outsourcing services have the proper "ramp-up capability," said Mr.
Sharma, whose company operates a facility in India that provides U.S.-based
TPAs with claims administration services.
"You need to make sure the offshore
vendor understands what the business needs are" and can handle an
increasing volume of claims from a TPA without a decline in the level of
service, he said.
Another good question for employers to pose
is, "What are the benefits the TPA has seen, and how much will be passed
to the self-funded plan?" Mr. Sharma said.
Speaking in a session at the Self-Insurance
Institute of America Inc.'s annual conference in Miami, Mr. Sharma said
employers should get better turnaround times on claims administered by TPAs
that outsource vs. those that don't.
Mr. Sharma said that low-cost labor in India
and China helps drive the savings from outsourcing.
"At this point in time, clearly, India
has an advantage," he said, because of the country's large pool of
skilled, English-speaking labor.
Apart from the savings, outsourcing has other
benefits, Mr. Sharma said.
TPAs become more efficient because they can
file their claims electronically to offshore locations at the end of the day
and have them administered and back on their office computers by the next
morning, he said.
If a TPA is not outsourcing, an employer
should find out why not, Mr. Sharma said.
TPAs, he said, will save money as well as
improve service to their clients by outsourcing.
"From a pure cost perspective, I don't
think any argument can be made against outsourcing," Mr. Sharma said.
TPAs typically see savings of 30% to 40% when
they outsource functions of their claims management services, he said.
There are some caveats, though, for TPAs that
are considering sending claims offshore, Mr. Sharma said.
Outsourcing is booming, he said, and anyone
with the capability to take on work is jumping on the bandwagon. "Every
(information technology) company in India is ready to provide outsourcing to
health care plans. You need to evaluate whether a vendor has the expertise you
need for the level of service you provide," Mr. Sharma said.
It is also important to make sure the service
provider has proper training and recruitment processes in place, he said.
"Do they have any health care clients, or
are you going to be a guinea pig for them?" Mr. Sharma asked.
He told SIIA attendees that the Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act "is a very big issue"
when it comes to privacy and security issues. The TPA must make sure that a
vendor has in place the proper guidelines and safeguards to make sure that
information protected under HIPAA is guarded.
Mr. Sharma referred to a case in which a Pakistani medical records transcriber
threatened to post protected health information on the Internet if she wasn't
paid for her work. The transcriber, who was working on records that had been
outsourced four separate times, withdrew her extortion threat after receiving
partial payment (BI, May 31). The incident illustrated some of the privacy
concerns related to outsourcing.
Employers and TPAs should know what safeguards
vendors have in place to protect information and whether records are passed
along to other vendors.
"What are the checks that they have in place?" Mr. Sharma asked.
|